16 Comments

The original Scream is one of my very favorite movies, with each sequel entertaining me less and less while at least being somewhat enjoyable still even by 4. I've been hoping for the reviews to convince me one way or another on how much of a priority I should make this new film, and I swear every time I read a positive one, then I see a negative one, positive, then negative. Which fortunate critic will knock me off of this see saw in either one direction or the other?

Expand full comment

I'd see this one. As I said in my review, it's very well-executed and clever. I just think the franchise (and Hollywood) is pretty exhausted.

Expand full comment

is this the second best Scream?

Expand full comment

I don't know. I did revisit the first one before seeing this film, but wasn't really up for the full run of the series. The sequels are all a blur in my mind, though it seems like many folks are fond of Scream 4.

Expand full comment

Everyone seems pretty united on thinking 3 is the worst one, 4 has a mix of defenders and detractors, and then 2 seems to be well liked.

Expand full comment

Then see it I must! I was going to see Licorice Pizza with a friend tonight, but no longer!

(Okay, too far in the other direction Anderson, ease back)

Expand full comment

Nearly had a heart attack there.

Expand full comment

Fear not, I'm not that much of a wild card.

Expand full comment

Two personal Scream-related tidbits for you: 1. Keith and I met in New York City at the junket for Good Will Hunting and Scream 2 in New York. I had never been to NYC or a junket (the latter we'd give up pretty quickly-- very unseemly), and I just happened to sit next to Keith at the screening for GWH. As two Midwestern cinephiles, we hit it off well and chatted all weekend. (I knew Keith by his byline, since my roommate subscribed to The Onion print edition by mail.) I was in grad school at the time in Miami FL, and The Onion was looking for a writer to head up the A.V. Club in Chicago, where they were setting up shop in 1998. I did not get that job, but I was able to freelance for about a year and a half while working on my M.A., and I was brought up in '99. Anyway, Keith and I bonded over being the only people in the room who were ho-hum on GWH, though I confess to coming around on it (a little bit) since. 2. At the Scream 2 junket, I learned an important entertainment journalist lesson: Never tell the talent what you actually think of a movie, even when asked. Courteney Cox wanted to know what I thought about Scream 2 and babbled out my mixed feelings about it as politely as I could. Then when it came time in the roundtable for me to ask a question of her, it did not get an expansive response to say the least. (Though it's possible I was simply inept at my job.)

Expand full comment

They shouldn't ask if they don't want to know!

Expand full comment

Maybe Courteney Cox learned something on that day, too.

Expand full comment

Maybe the friends we made along the way were the real Courtney Cox and I'm just spinning out now somebody help

Expand full comment

Scott, I don't know if you've seen THE EMPTY MAN but I finally caught up with it over the weekend, and it's the breath of non-franchise fresh air your review is SCREAM-ing for. The horror genre's MARGARET!

Expand full comment

I’ve seen it. It’s a wild one. Really dug it, as did Keith. Maybe worth thinking about for a future newsletter.

Expand full comment

I thought that there was more going on than the recycling that this review talks about. Spoilers ahoy (I’ll try to keep them vague).

Eg the way that the film’s title- far from being an indicator that it’s embarrassed about being a sequel - is part of the commentary on soft fan-service reboots like Halloween 2018 and The Last Skywalker; the theme of intergenerational trauma and guilt, which pushes an obsession that runs through Wes Craven’s entire filmography in a new direction; the way it plays with audience expectation, eg two characters in the movie foolishly go into the basement alone at different points; what happens to them?

And **major spoilers here involving the ending**

I wouldn’t call what happens to Tara just a new wrinkle. Every other slasher series is about the killer, while Scream has always been about the survivors. This takes it a step further, as well as writing off the villains as losers destined to be forgotten. The way that the casting & eventual fate of one character explicitly references & critiques a recent “change the real-life ending” movie is part of this.

It’s not a perfect movie but it’s hardly The Dream Child or A New Beginning in terms of series exhaustion.

Expand full comment

"There may be more than one way to skin a cat, but the number is well under five" Haha, YES. Awesome.

I watched all the Scream movies for the first time last fall, and feel that there is one good movie, and 3 adequate re-workings of the exact same thing. I enjoyed running the series, which means that *sigh* I am part of the problem and will definitely watch this one if it is competently made and reasonably entertaining.

Expand full comment