Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Kleppinger's avatar

I'm a big fan of Lynch's Dune despite its flaws. To me it feels like he got halfway through the book before he realized he had to wrap everything up in another half hour. I have to wonder what his film might have looked like if he didn't have the real-world budgetary and time constraints (both in terms of production time and runtime). I'd happily watch a 4-hour version of Lynch's Dune if it meant he got to give the second half of the book as much attention as the first.

Which is something that makes me particularly excited for Villeneuve's attempt. He's not pretending to adapt the entire book and just relying on positive reception and goodwill to get to film the rest. I really hope it's good (and it sounds like it is) and that he gets his chance to finish the project.

Glorbes's avatar

I like Lynch's Dune, even though I know it is also incomprehensible and flawed in many ways. It has to be one of the weirdest Blockbuster-budgeted movies ever made, and while I agree that the quality of the visuals is wildly inconsistent, when it looks good, it looks REALLY good.

I kind of feel like Jodorowsky's Dune, the documentary, is probably the best case scenario for imagining what the film could be. I can't conceive of that project ever working, and this is one time where the studios were probably 100% right to NOT go that route. Sure, it would be a hell of a thing to see, but I also fully expect that it'd be borderline unwatchable.

Here's hoping the new film finds an audience enough to make the next film.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?